It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both ideas by giving your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is widely known today that some people are born with innate talents from the mother’s womb, or that it is a possibility to acquire such talents through challenging work. In this essay, I am going to test the two sides of the coin and extend my favor to the second view.
The head of the coin reveals whether one inherited the natural gift of God, which he does not have to sharpen one’s skills. The core reason to acknowledge this claim is that many of the well-known musicians and athletes have displayed astonishing process and achieving countless awards at an early age. A perfect example of this is the classical musician, Mozart, who was a prodigy in composing music since his childhood. Therefore, it is to no surprise that this view is a favorite by many people.
The flip side of the coin depicts the opposite view of this case. Certainly, it is possible for talented people to be beaten by people who work thousand times more harder. The supporting idea is that under the right environment, plus good preparations, people can master the skills which could allow them to excel in their desired professions or talents such as music or sports. Moreover, with the help of current modern technologies, which could analyze and direct people to success, becoming skilled is not a fantasy anymore. For instance, the athlete’s statistics are great motivations for them to achieving newer heights in sports, thus leading them to remarkable results, like the miracle that happened to Vietnamese U-23 football team. With that, this viewpoint could be realistic and reliable
In the end, both views have their own advantages. However, in my opinion, a mix of the two positives can produce brilliant and admirable results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...eaten by people who work thousand times more harder. The supporting idea is that under the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00684931507 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73220500208 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9752547222 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144898591418 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455932343587 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352634488196 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753193574217 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400320591748 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.