Hard work is the key of success. Nothing can be achieved without practice. There are some ongoing arguments whether people can be successful in the field of Art and Sports with a natural talent or proper guidance. In this essay I will highlight both the side and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims, although I tend to agree with the nothion that a child can be guided to become a successful artist or a sportsman.
First and foremost, there is shortcut of success. In other words, everyone needs to work hard to achieve success. Hence, this theory is applicable for the fields of art as well as sport. Although, a child is not naturally gifted, he or she can brag the success if he/she gets the proper guidance along with the hard work. For instance, Sachin Tendulakar, one of the greatest cricketer in the world, wanted to be a fast bowler, but his coach guided him to be a batsman and the rest is history. Therefore, proper teaching technique can guide a child to be a successful individual.
Additionally, talent can be ignored if there is no one to guide. To pressie, without a genuine teacher no one can understand about the hidden talent. Despite of having talent, people may not be successful in the field of sports or art. To exemplify, Shahrukh khan, the biggest bollywood superstar, wanted to be a sportsman in his childhood but his hidden acting talent was recognised by his teacher and guided him towards the field of art. Hence, without guidance talent in born talent can be overlooked.
Conversely, natural talent sometime leads to success. In other words, sometime people are mature enough to find out the natural talent within themselves, while there is no one to guide. I would like to cite an example. Sudip Dan, my best friend, lost his parents in a car accident in his early childhood and forced to study in a low level public school in my city, instead of that he found his natural ability of painting and today's date he is the most famous painter in my city. Hence, natural talent sometime help us to fetch the success but we need to identify that by ourselves only.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that, although natural talent is important to shine in the field of sport and art, nothing can be achieved without hard work and proper guidance, especially in the childhood.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68280871671 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55149292389 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486682808717 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4169683318 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0952380952 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323261999746 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116256904111 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730401302326 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207251162626 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702071051187 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.