A knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowdays. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
on the valid standpoints of this statement.
To begin with, there are lots of employments that no longer require maths knowledge. Employees do not need to perform calculations like adding up bills and calculating percentages while at work. These basic works are done by technologies such as electronic tills and computers. For instance, computer programs that can calculate invoices and future sales forecasts eliminated the necessity of doing mannual calculations. About 90% of the population is working these sort of jobs. So, it would be fair to say that, mathematics is not necessary to perform various duties. Apart from this, there are various fields such as arts, acting and literature do not rely on maths knowledge at all.
Moving further, it is important to note that there are and always will be some masses who will need for mathematics to their jobs. Arenas such as engineering and architecture require a wide knowledge of mathematics. It would be impossible for an architect to design buildings without using maths. I believe, this particular job cannot be solely performed by computers or programs. If work of these types of jobs are performing by electronic devices, then it will ruins the business. It is not only dangerous for business, but also for workers. For example, according to the survey, it can be vividly manifested that, merely a quarter of employments will depend on maths knowledge and it is necessary for them to perform their calculations by themselves. So, mathematics knowledge is a requirement of those folks, who are working in the fields of architecture and engineering. Apart from these two professions, ins and outs of mathematics is not required.
In compendium, advancement in technology, decreases the necessity of mathematics for various duties. In the epic era, the role of mathematics is played by some electronic devices. However, there are some sectors who will always rely on mathematics knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
on the valid standpoints of this statement...
^^
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
... About 90% of the population is working these sort of jobs. So, it would be fair to say th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...s, acting and literature do not rely on maths knowledge at all. Moving further, it i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'ruin'
Suggestion: ruin
...ing by electronic devices, then it will ruins the business. It is not only dangerous ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...a quarter of employments will depend on maths knowledge and it is necessary for them ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, apart from, for example, for instance, sort of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21337579618 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05321678623 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1807831067 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.85 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177897014413 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532880531507 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047678710203 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11231059173 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530712715198 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.