The is no doubt that the most significant change and development occur in the last 20 years worldwide thanks to the appearance of information technology (IT). The instances are countless from free access to the World Wide Web via the internet to its underlying role in communication through email, and other forms of virtual social interaction. However, it is claimed that further progress in the IT field will feasibly cause more detrimental consequences than constructive ones, I am not convinced with such a statement to a certain extent.
Human lives have undergone notable and marked changes due to technological breakthroughs. It has profoundly accelerated whatever human beings had dealt with, from productions in massive companies to household chores or even in art creation. By way of the illustration, nowadays, the majority of people worldwide can access numerous information and unknowns by browsing through the internet. These technological developments not only alter human life in all vital aspects of their lives, but they also play an essential role in environmental preservation by its provided measures. For instance, by introducing electric vehicles and renewable energy, it effectively fights against the culprits behind the global warming crisis.
Furthermore, IT satisfactory services are not limited to what mentioned above. A number of fascinating developments in medical industries, surgeries, and overcoming destructive pandemic would not come acute without IT assistance. It also opens the door to a strange and astonishing world, artificial intelligence (AI). This centerpiece is going to surpass some restrictions that humans confront in terms of the volume of information and processes regarding outer space explorations or human-related facts that are considered the most complicated issues for today's scientists.
To conclude, although the future of IT, especially in the AI process is mysterious and frightening to some extent, from my viewpoint, scientists know how to cope with and apply it to increase human life standards as it has done over the previous 20 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... it is claimed that further progress in the IT field will feasibly cause more detrimen...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...claimed that further progress in the IT field will feasibly cause more detrimental co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it has done over the previous 20 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56074766355 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24779764696 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676012461059 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.595229217 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.307692308 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210846141245 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592715628046 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564394697222 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105750711022 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802198851757 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.