It is proven that international tourism is responsible for countless merits for the host countries. At the same time, there are some concerns regarding such a trend influence on the local environment. From my perspective, although the tourism industry has some detrimental effects on regional sites, it accompanies more benefits.
There is no doubt that tourism has numerous constructive and beneficial impacts on both the economy and society. On the one hand, it strengthens and broadens the cultural diversity and the people's understanding and comprehension of another culture, tradition, history, beliefs, attitudes, and values. By way of illustration, both tourists and residents communicate with each other and strive to learn their language in order to enable them to make a mutual connection. So, they can have a better understanding of their identities and customs. Besides, local residents can raise their awareness and knowledge of overseas visitors' countries if they come from developed nations and learn to foster their facilities and services based on the latest and most advanced technologies, concluding, boost their profits.
On the other hand, it can be seen that the rush of tourists to intact and unspoiled areas cause some devastating consequences. For an instant, in some cases, the local people have to sacrifice their natural resources to accommodate the tourists' insatiable demands. But in comparison to this that they are a significant source of income and revenues for any host countries, such destructive functions are controllable. These mean, if a country tends to have a healthy and permanent interaction and exchange cross countries, their government and authority should enact appropriate and balanced regulations and laws.
To conclude, although tourism alters a double edge sword that accompanies both merits and demerits, I am convinced that this emerged industry has more advantages either culturally and socially or financially for the host country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...broadens the cultural diversity and the peoples understanding and comprehension of anot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, regarding, so, then, no doubt, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54605263158 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09912417259 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3876079853 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132888961035 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506575332275 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615869809637 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923106923303 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787363384088 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.