Living in today's contemporary world has convinced some people that the radical emphasis of curriculums in primary schools must be on science and technology. Other subjects such as history and geography should place in the back seat because they lack benefits and value for modern humans. I am convinced that all topics have equal importance, and I will support my opinion through rationales below.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that technology's acquisition and application alter to a must-be skill nowadays. Furthermore, primary school is the best and the most appropriate place of learning such skills, as well as other abilities, whither educational or personal. Students are fresh and intellectual enough to comprehend what they are trained about genuinely and precisely. If they do not acquaint thoroughly with using computers and deal with them, they may leave beyond their peers in such a world that thanks to technological developments and science, the principles and standards of living are fostering at an uncontrollable pace.
On the other hand, it is proven that some traditional teaching subjects, like history and geography, have their own vital role in the education process based on several reliable research. We are human, and some dominant features distinguish us from artificial intelligence, such as our in-depth understanding of humanity, philanthropy, and environmental diagnostics. Meanwhile, these values can merely be fulfilled by knowing of fate and sacrifices of our ancient ancestors through history. Besides, another essential modern life skill is to interact and communicate with other nations and have an accurate understanding of their position and location in the globe through geographical education.
To conclude, although it seems that some subjects, like history and geography, are redundant to be taught in the modern primary school curriculum. When science and technology play a significant role in human lives, I claim that entire of them are mandatory in educating rejuvenile children and are one another complementary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dren and are one another complementary.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, no doubt, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51257861635 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09058709162 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1652146377 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.846153846 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132943889336 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043731501538 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389600644645 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083942047136 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324015506322 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.