Some individuals are of the opinion that some ancient constructions and buildings should be preserved due to their values and functions. From my perspective, some historical and old religious structures well worth protecting, and the merits of such an action surpass any potential demerits.
It is proven that some ancient and historical buildings can convey a considerable amount of accurate information about the regional ancestors' history and values. By illustration, all palaces, heritage sites, and precious castles related to thousands of years ago, which are carved recently by several renowned archeologists, reveal many crucial facts and unknown mysteries about previous eras' civilizations. Besides, monuments, temples, and holy shrines are invaluable treasures of past religions. These buildings are not only valuable in terms of religious, spiritual massages, and in-depth thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes, but they are also riched sources of olden architectures and designs that amazed today's humans dramatically.
Furthermore, there is no doubt that some traditional buildings reflect the culture, art, and history of a particular nation, and there are a number of justification rationales following these buildings' maintenance importance. First of all, there are valid and reliable visual books about all sacrifices and endeavors that our ancestors shouldered to we can live in tranquility and peace today. Secondly, it is recommended that these buildings alter museums to strengthen and broaden the next generation's perception and cognitive surrounding their own or other nations' customs and history '. Last by not least, the more old constructions be preserved from any feasible demolishing in order to be replaced by skyscrapers and tall smart-buildings, the more cultural identity and diversity will be conserved, which is essential for this contemporary time.
To conclude, although some people consciously support the idea of ancient structures' maintenance, I hold the view that mentioned buildings worth protecting given the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ancestors'' or 'ancestor's'?
Suggestion: ancestors'; ancestor's
...accurate information about the regional ancestors history and values. By illustration, al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ustification rationales following these buildings maintenance importance. First of all, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...eums to strengthen and broaden the next generations perception and cognitive surrounding th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...own or other nations customs and history . Last by not least, the more old constru...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82781456954 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18747644691 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5250166353 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278121992331 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881195273489 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853543151916 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156119789112 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820597950741 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.