A novel method that some firms are implementing in terms of salesmen's payment is that they will be paid based on the amount of sale they can have to the customers and buyers. From my perspective, the drawbacks of such a trend prevail in its potential merits due to below rationales.
It seems that it may be an effective procedure, and it makes more competitiveness among salespeople. The more they could sell, the more money they would make. Such an attitude would be neither in the advantage of sales employees nor the customers. First of all, customers may find it inconvenient in which to be advised or bothered, in some cases, by sellers to what is more recommended and what is not. Actually, they prefer to purchase out of freedom not out of any outer strain, or annoying and redundant suggests that salespeople provide to guarantee their profits instead of customers' sake. Secondly, it is a possible thing that an unhealthy or destructive comparison and competitiveness will form among employees. By illustration, they may persuade each other's consumers to purchase from themselves or convey a piece of inappropriate information about their rival colleagues in order to win the game of selling more at any cost.
Furthermore, although such an idea will promote job productivity and raise the company's revenue, salespeople alter some robots charged by selling more and more. I meant that other companionship behaviors, such as customers' rights, welfare, or benefit, place beyond personal incomes. Last but not least, there is no doubt that one of the most crucial factors for applicants in the recruitment process is job security and insurance involvement. If they are paid based on their performance on a daily basis, no acute and sustainable commitment will occur.
To conclude, although the opinion of receiving wage and incentive according to the salespeople's sales is profitable for the recruiter firm, I am not convinced that such a trend will assist sellers' benefits as well as costumers' convenience and validity due to what I have mentioned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, i mean, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09171597633 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02902667964 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7719939228 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177315877594 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548273929365 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454320996545 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995069439461 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248088899243 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.