Companies pay salespeople according to how much they sell to customers. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages both to salespeople and customers?
A novel method that some firms are implementing in term of salesmen's payment is, they will be payed based on the amount of selling they can have to the customers and buyers. From my perspective the drawbacks of such a trend prevail its potential merits due to below rationales.
It seems that it may be a profitable measure and it makes more competitiveness among salespeople. The more they could sell, the more money they would make. Such attitude would be neither in the advantageous of sales employees nor the customers. First of all, customers may find it inconvenient in which to be advised or bothered, in some cases, by sellers to what is more recommended and what is not. Actually, they prefer to purchase out of freedom not out of any outer strain or annoying and redundant suggests that salesmen provide to guarantee their personal profits instead of customers's sake. Secondly, it is a feasible thing that an unhealthy or destructive comparison and competitiveness have been formed among employees. By illustration, they may persuade each other's consumer to purchase from themselves or convey an inappropriate information about their rival colleagues in order to win the game of selling more at any cost.
Furthermore, although such idea will promote the job productivity and rise the company's revenue as well, salespeople alter some robots that are charged by selling more and more. What I meant is that other companionship behaviors, such as customers' right, welfare or fair situate beyond personal incomes. Last but not least, there is no doubt that one of the most crucial factors for applicants in the recruitment process is job security and insurance involvement. If they be paid based on their performance on a daily basis, no acute and sustainable commitment will be occurred.
To conclude, although the opinion of receiving wage and incentive regarding how much the salespeople can sell is an absolute merit to the recruiter firm, I am not convinced that such a trend assists sellers' benefits as well as costumers' convenient and validity given to what I have just mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 770, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...By illustration, they may persuade each others consumer to purchase from themselves or...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le alter some robots that are charged by selling more and more. What I meant is t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, i mean, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06647398844 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97792927191 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5902408813 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.214285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181453092724 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536166258274 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507376859869 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10933618781 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155369355227 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.