Recently, there is a boom in industrial development. Many companies prefer to have older people as their instititional heads. While others are of the view that fresh blood could handle the position more efficiently. I completely agree with this point of view.
First thing to be considered is educational qualification. Modern education euips people with all the skill sets, which are essential for a good leader. Especially, degree like master of bussiness administration is for preparing people to suit to such environments. But those of older generation are not aware of such methods.
Furthermore, youngsters are more energetic and are more dedicated towards work as they have to focuss more to build theirown career. In addition, they will be more creative and have fresh ideas that could increase the productivity.
Moreover, they will be adept at handling modern technologies. Particulary internet and using different application they will be able to complete their task on time. Moreover, interpersonal skills will be more advanced in them which helps them to handle difficult situations.
In conclusion, some people favour old to be in leadership owing to their experience, i believe that youngsters are more suited for this because of their trainining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er people as their instititional heads. While others are of the view that fresh blood...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 86, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n leadership owing to their experience, i believe that youngsters are more suited...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 198.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42929292929 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08264972278 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.764231991 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7857142857 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12083093411 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415369695432 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302290232402 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652347283622 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032709153028 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.