Leaders and directors in organization are normally older people .Some people think younger leader would be better . Do you agree or disagree ?
There are common that leader in the company are older people but some point of view that leader should be younger people. In my opinion, older leader better than younger leader however younger people can become a good leader in the near future if they are long-suffering to study from their senior.
To begin with, older people can be good leader for some reasons. Firstly, older people have more experience in both leadership and working. Older leader have many years to work and they understand more than anyone else about working process and obstacles in work. Hence, they can resolve problems quickly and direct truly junior. Secondly, older people often have respect from others. This is because they contribute and bring success to the company they work for. There for, they have powerful voice and people can obey them. In opposite, it is difficult that younger people can direct people who are the same generation.
In the other hand, the important positions should be given for younger people and they can be a good leader in the near future. In fact, younger people have more creation so they can have newer way to resolve work. Besides, they have good health and they can withstand pressure within large workload. As the time spent working with their senior, they can learn more about experience and leadership so they can success in a day not far.
In conclusion, leader positive should given for older people but younger people need to be supported to become a leader in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an be a good leader in the near future. In fact, younger people have more creation...
^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
... In conclusion, leader positive should given for older people but younger people nee...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86328125 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21127909795 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47265625 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.132812496 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314947448711 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149529181904 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131142496862 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279071954323 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120568558784 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.