Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think young leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
As an ordinary, most managers and headmen in an organization are seniors, while some folks say that youngsters should hold these positions. Although I believe that aged people are more proficient to be leaders, young generations have significant bases to be good leaders that the elders don’t have to build for sustainable development in the future
On the one hand, elderly people can be good leaders for the following reasons. First of all, since they are older, they have more experience in their working fields. Therefore, they are more confident in what they do while younger people will get quite confused in their first tasks. Secondly, the most important thing is that they have leadership skills that are not natural or innate, it is because they have more time to cultivate their ability to communicate, resolve conflicts, and problem-solving skills. Older people mostly have composure and a powerful voice to command other people, while youngsters may have trouble in training subordinates.
On the other hand, young leaders have features that seniors can not have. Firstly, they are passionate about their jobs, in other words, they are full of enthusiasm to constantly endeavor and improve themselves. Furthermore, younger people dare to try in new fields, whether they are risky. Secondly, we cannot deny that younger generations have more thorough training, also, they are more receptive and faster. For example, while applying technology to the operation or business activities of the enterprise helps create better value for customers, there are a majority of old people who are ‘blind’ of technology, however, youngsters can acquire it easily with their flexible brains and device more optimal development plans, depending on technology, in this digital age.
To conclude, despite agreeing that older people have more experiences and skills to become leaders in an organization, I do also believe that younger generations have qualities and attribute to take on the leadership go further.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or sustainable development in the future On the one hand, elderly people can be g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have trouble in training subordinates. On the other hand, young leaders have fe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...better value for customers, there are a majority of old people who are ‘blind’ of techno...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ers, there are a majority of old people who are ‘blind’ of technology, however, youngst...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng on technology, in this digital age. To conclude, despite agreeing that older...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36593059937 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81120170725 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.2642418474 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202216536161 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783133814385 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688260866907 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154752616066 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540679252775 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.