Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some folks believe that some stringent rules about rackets should be publicized to prevent noise pollution, while others think that they have the right to make any sound they want. From my perspective, I agree that noise should be put under control.
In some cases, noise should be allowed to make for people’s justifiable needs. Firstly, at some public events such as football matches or festivals, cheering and singing are essential things, we cannot ban noise because these are the occasions for people to relax and have fun. Secondly, these days, there are various types of equipment that could block noise such as soundproofing doors, windows and foam panels. These give people the freedom to roister without disturbing others. However, they are not always applied everywhere, thus, uproar could still be made and annoy surrounding people.
These following reasons explain why I think there should be strict controls about noise. First of all, rumpuses affect other people’s health and repose considerably. By this I mean, they can cause hearing loss or sleep disturbances if the noise is too loud and long-lasting. Furthermore, it is so impolite and ill-mannered to influence people’s work. Take my English class as an example. Our class’s location is near a house which always sings karaoke loudly in our studying time. As a result, some of the students are distracted, they cannot pay full attention to the lessons and especially, the listening sections.
In conclusion, from my point of view, although people have the right to make noise, it should be limited to avoid affecting others’ health and peacefulness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...udly in our studying time. As a result, some of the students are distracted, they cannot pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, i mean, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22053231939 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69804484666 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9345978574 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436874445152 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122490916803 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105059394768 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257145517542 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108076176414 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.