Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some peple say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree ?
In recent years, more and more young people have leadership positions in organizations. However, it is still argued that these positions must be for the older ones. I partly agree with this point of view.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why leaders and directors should be older people. First, it is hard for the young's leadership to be accepted by the press. In Eastern culture, for example, younger people are often considered as lack of sufficient abilities to manage important aspects of business such as long-term business strategies, the establishment of wide and steady network of partners or supportive long term colleagues. Second, the notable drawback of youngsters is short of real experience. If they have to face with any crisis, mistake may be occur and this will influence on many employees' earn of living.
On the other hand, despite disadvantages, there are always valuable opportunities for youngsters to be leaders. A dorminant reason is that they have creative thinking and always adapt to new element of market. It is evident that they can build innovative breakthrough policies to conduct a business. Another reason is that the young have longer time of contribution than the older counterparts. If the young and the elder have the same qualifications and capabilities, there are more chances for young people to be selected. Because many years of life are waiting them for anticipation to grow a business.
In conlusion, despite the fact that high positions in organizations are often older pepole, the benifits that younger people brings with the role as the leaders should not be ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of living. On the other hand, despite disadvantages, there are always valuable...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12359550562 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89086661618 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.828699491 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204496964563 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622411308229 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068411148611 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137574798816 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643224383407 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.