Lectures were used in the past with many students. With modern technology available for education, there is no justification for this way of teaching.

Essay topics:

Lectures were used in the past with many students. With modern technology available for education, there is no justification for this way of teaching.

The critical increase and popularization of homeschooling has become an unstoppable trend, yet argument regarding its utility and benefits seems to not be ceased. Despite the major invasion of education through internet and technology, many believe that going to traditional school is still required, of which I second.

The intention of homeschooling is to reduce the amount of time and effort when one is not going to school. Driven by this vision, the scale of this method has risen remarkably in the last century, managed to help and getting their students internationally recognized certificates. Additionally, the Internet has a wide range of knowledge and is always up-to-date, which is immensely beneficial for individuals wanting to comprehend as many and profound as possible.

However, studying through modern technologies is overly complex. One of the most important reason for this is the accuracy in the lectures; the Internet can vary widely in information, which will consist of both correct and imprecise knowledge. An inexperienced learner will not be able to apprehend, which leads to the aftermath of a wrong way to study. In addition, Internet comprises a lot of temptations and distractions that can easily drive a learner away from their goals of gaining decent knowledge. Indeed, this problem can be solved by the supervision of instructors in the traditional classroom, which also stimulate your exertion of learning.

In a nutshell, studying in traditional method is generally a better and safer way, as you will receive the precise information and motivation you required to get to your accomplishments.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, so, still, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33082706767 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13858219169 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5967913357 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.909090909 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113225332986 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384879996089 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307972666284 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574889850636 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375517327493 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.