Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in major cities in Vietnam.
What are the reasons for this? Suggest some solutions.
Major metropolises in Vietnam have witnessed an alarming rate of juvenile delinquency in the past few years. From my perspective, the deficiency of parental supervision and the increasing level of poverty are the primary causes, and better parental care, as well as vocational education provided by the government, can tackle the problem and lower the crime rate.
Firstly, the root cause of youth crime lies in the way adolescents are nurtured by family members, particularly their parents. For the best development of children, parents have to treat them with love, care, and support throughout their childhood. However, the sad reality is that contemporary parents tend to be workaholics in the belief that: if they have higher incomes, their children will have a more fulfilling life. Therefore, they inadvertently neglect their children, and what is more serious, they are not capable of giving advice or support to their children when it is most needed. To solve this, parents must spend more time with their children to shape children’s thoughts and behaviors; thus, this may restrain children from making mistakes and then committing a crime.
Another considerable factor is abject poverty caused by globalization, which widens the yawning gap between the wealthy and the impoverished. This inevitably means that those who were unfortunately born in indigent families and are reluctant to work industriously, turn to robbery and theft. I assume that strict sanctions are only able to partially mitigate youth crime, alternatively, the government should send young criminals to juvenile detention centers, where they can have a chance to improve themselves and get some vocational training so that they can find a job to support themselves later.
In conclusion, the juvenile offense is the consequence of insufficient care from parents and poverty, but efforts made by both family and the government will help reduce it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38943894389 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94619853886 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633663366337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3253726295 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124710989845 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425293349947 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317393026274 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631107081147 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407384311108 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.