Language gap is a significant issue for people who migrate to other countries. It is often argued that people would face serious difficulties when living in a country where speaking its native language is necessary. In my view, I partially agree with that and I believe speaking foreign language could make people integrate into other society easily.
It is unquesionable that speaking other nations' language incurs grave issues in terms of various aspects. Firstly, people would encounter difficulties in cultivating well relationship with their peers or classmates at the college. A vivid example could be observed among international students─Students who persue degree overseas often face serious problems such as incorporating themselves into the local students because both of whom speak distinct languages and be growned in disparate nationalities and culture. In this way, overseas students are incapable of interacting with native students effectively. Secondly, people may be treated unwellcomed due to the fact that they are incompetent of speaking the native language in the workplace. To demonstrate, employees from other countries may face discrimination of the local people and colleague. Thus, speaking foreign language induces social problems to some extent.
On the other hand, to speak the native language in the adopted country could make people assimilate into the society more simply. As language is an essential tool for human to communicate with each other, speaking languages of other country would narrow the gap between native speaker and the alliens. This is particularly true in France where people who speak French would be more accepted and welcomed by the native people. Hence, speaking foreign language is conducive.
All in all, as I have argued above, even though there is several negative impacts on socializing and the relationships at school, I side with the fact that speaking other countries' language is beneficial immigrants or international students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...It is unquesionable that speaking other nations language incurs grave issues in terms o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... side with the fact that speaking other countries language is beneficial immigrants or in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57049180328 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01686738971 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1733052663 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210472237347 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884518718388 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487961393567 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145238197557 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192259275236 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.