A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problem if it is not managed correctly. Do you think that benefits of tourisms outweight its drawbacks?
Nowadays, tourism is a major source of income for many countries around the world. However, if governments don’t lead tourism accurately, it will be also a source of problem. Although doing this has several drawbacks, the advantages of it are far more important.
There are some disadvantages which can stem from tourism in the developed world. Firstly, tourists bring more money to the community so local citizens depend heavily on the tourism trading activities. This make people concentrate on development of some particular fields. Consequently, countries may face to an unbalanced growth economy. Secondly, some tourists don’t follow the domestic rules at public places such as museum, pagoda or church. In addition, tourism may increase the risk of illegal problems like thief, begging, drunk, drug, crime and prostitution. These issues will affect countries’ traditions and culture in long term.
Nevertheless, tourism can have some positive impacts which overshadow these downsides. One advantage could be that tourism create opportunities for companies to set up new services and products. This means that companies supply many jobs to local people and improve their average standard of living. As a result, the unemployment rate may decrease significantly and collecting taxes of the government may not evaded. Another advantage could be that if there are many visitors who come to travel, there will have many chances of trading like food, traditional cloth and souvenirs. With such advantage, citizens can earn more money, thereby contributing to the development of the nation’s economy.
In conclusion, despite the drawbacks that tourism can bring, it still does more good than harm.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59541984733 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96096626993 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3016921731 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2352941176 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259837057891 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810444660812 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084389387595 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170929397459 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860924835734 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.