Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past few years, the issue of maintaining public libraries has become highly controversial. Some people point out that the governments and municipalities have to preserve public libraries while others hold a different view. In this essay I will examine both sides of argument and provide my personal opinion.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons that public libraries should be kept from the governments and municipalities. The main reason is why people in favor of this issue is because it has valuable just only reason of historical building. A good illustration of this is that in Korea, there has law that old building is listed to cultural heritage since it was 100 years. Secondly, still many people use them especially reading a newspaper, take part in youth program and searching various information.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that nowadays we can replace libraries through developed technology. If we want to search about something, we would be able to acquire it from smart phone and also most people have had it. Secondly, developed technology is really useful. For example, Using computer or smart phone do not need to move and wast time. Because it can be just only click and touch.
In conclusion, this is a topic which is very relevant in modern society. Despite arguments to the contrary, still I agree that public libraries should be preserved. If would not, we might be able to lose the part of history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...e both sides of argument and provide my personal opinion. Generally speaking, there are two...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02016129032 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75254115871 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5502136745 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15170884843 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462498516479 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562511767703 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846821551973 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234266449691 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.