In many big cities in the world, the quality of life is decreasing. What are the causes and solutions for this?
It is argued that there is a decline in the quality of inhabitants’ life in several metropolises. There are a variety of rational explanation for this decrease in tandem with some measures to cope with this issue.
To begin with, there are two culprits leading to the falling quality of city dwellers’ life. Firstly, because of the overpopulation occurring in large cities, urban citizens are faced with serious air pollution due to emissions from private vehicles. This kind of pollution causes dangerous diseases such as respiratory diseases, especially lung cancer. Secondly, residents in hustling and bustling cities tend to be invariably struggling with the overload of public services. It is the fact that this negative reality directly affects the urban life. For example, during rush hours, commuting with a bus seems to become a challenge resulting of the crowds of people.
It should be offered several viable measures to enhance the living standard of city inhabitants. The most influential solution could be depended on the relocation of manufacturing industry. Most people desire to reside in urban areas with the aim of searching for career prospects, therefore, if factories are relocated in other places such as suburb or countryside, the population would be scattered rather than gather in metropolises solely. Another measure to tackle this issue is that the government should allocate funding for upgrading public services and accommodating more amenities for city dwellers.
In conclusion, despite numerous reasons for the decrease in quality of life in big cities due to the overpopulation, there are a number of available ways to tackle this problem which could be removing a number of factories or improving both quality and quantity of service supplied for the residents .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ty of service supplied for the residents .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44522968198 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02849654305 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593639575972 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.716130252 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275638552127 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910106757089 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626293538481 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172157687558 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415370541632 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.