For many years, vaccines given to a child at birth have helped to prevent many childhood diseases. Tremendous awareness of various vaccines has been made by many organisations as well as the government. However, whether immunisation of children against diseases should be made by law or individuals to have a right to decide immunisation for their children is a matter of argument.
Before vaccines were introduced, many diseases among young children were reported. Newborn children would have low immunity due to which they would be easily prone to diseases. People were not able to understand how they could prevent this forthcoming. In some cases, children would get infected with diseases that would stay with them all their lives, for example, Polio. As science advanced, various vaccines were developed to cope with most of the childhood diseases. Government and other non-profit organisations started taking initiatives to educate people about the availability of vaccines and how it could prevent many diseases.
It is argued that immunising children against common diseases should be made by law. Vaccines are extremely necessary but some may not be affordable by all. Also, it is observed that not many hospitals and private clinics have made this facility available with them. Moreover, not all vaccines may be required to be taken by all children as some may or may not suit their body. Therefore, to constitute immunisation of children by law may have some drawbacks.
On the other hand, if individuals are given the right to choose immunisation for their children, there could be some disadvantages too. Some people may not find it necessary to use vaccines as they feel it is not effective. Some assume that since they never got affected by diseases without vaccines, their child too will not be affected. In addition to this, some may take only a few vaccines as per their choice and knowledge. If people continue to do all this, childhood diseases may become difficult to prevent.
To conclude, some important vaccines should be made by law so that childhood diseases can be prevented.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16618075802 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80050970234 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478134110787 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3248513262 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483407157223 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163297278487 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144857620115 0.0667982634062 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318819800169 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101487718866 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.