In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and the sense of community is lost. What are the causes and measures to turn it around?
The sense of social unity is on the decline, whereas the isolated lifestyle of city dwellers is on the increase. This tendency might be the consequence of the emerging industry 4.0 era. To address such a burning issue, the authority of a community must take action to make residents become acquaintances.
With respect to the reason why urban people are distant to their neighbors, the novel technological revolution is the matter in question here. Because nowadays people can Google anything they need to know with a click of a button, they no longer think about asking others for help. For example, neighbors used to bump into each other and ask the other person to do small favors such as repairing electricity or fixing plumbs. On top of that, people also have various responsibilities like career, children as well as family, which takes up nearly all of their day. Every urban people have to work from nine to five, and then come home to domestic duties such as preparing dinner for their kids.
Regarding the approach to resolving this loss of public interaction, the head of the community should create more opportunities to boost communication. If there are more local events in a residential area, people who live there will be encouraged to go out and have higher chances to make friends. These occasions, however, must not be formal, but rather entertaining and attractive. For instance, local citizens may come to a Sunday BBQ party which is held by the local authority and provides free admission. It will additionally be more interesting if there are sessions of talks where moms of similar hobbies can meet up and exchange speeches.
In conclusion, people are growing away from one another due to the result of an ever-increasing number of household responsibilities. To bring them closer again, events organized by local communities should be held frequently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with respect to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0641025641 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89893171055 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644230769231 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.988306206 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14414513605 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398947559014 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349660756 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791584278819 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447925281588 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.