In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents?
In the contemporary life, whether or not it would be better for the public authority take a metropolitan arranging of regular places, for example, instructive offices, shopping center, place of business, and residental regions in isolated districts stays a wellspring of debate. As I would see it, I accept that advantages of such orchestrating would dominate drawbacks for some pricipal reasons beneath.
First and foremost, there are a few disadvantages of getting sorted out these offices in isolated spots of metropolitans. All things considered, presidents will in general utilize every now and again private vehicles to cover significant distances to go out to shop shopping center or go out on the town to shop shopping center or to go to their work environments. Resultantly, gas discharge from vehicles prompts the nursery impact, which may devastatingly affect the planet later on. In addition, understudies may discover it difficultto will school as they should spend an incredible arrangement for their moving. This will place the orchestrating in the issue at certain territories might be exceptionally near school, some may extremely distant which is nonsensical.
Regardless, I uphold the perspective on the individuals who accept that the advantage of orchestrating the design of metropolitan would exceed the downside. A large number of us concur that setting isolated districts will unmistakable reason would viably ease gridlock. At the point when residents are moved for the living and working in specific territories, which is situated continuing a similar way. Therefore, this method of isolating would lessen the current voyaging over-burden since it diminishes in the expanded of day by day explorers on the central avenue during times of heavy traffic. In addition, having this arrangement in metropolitan territories, I accept that it would alleviate the populace blasts in explicit areas.
All in all, I can't help suspecting that the downside of having isolated areas are obscured by the favorable position for some impressive reasons referenced previously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In the contemporary life, whether or not it would be better for the public autho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...metropolitan would exceed the downside. A large number of us concur that setting isolated distric...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ts in explicit areas. All in all, I cant help suspecting that the downside of ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to suspect' or 'suspect'.
Suggestion: to suspect; suspect
...icit areas. All in all, I cant help suspecting that the downside of having isolated ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52336448598 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16827484131 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5985852182 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.384615385 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140441050986 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476655698667 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233431441421 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780202410312 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190854217821 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.