Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new town be built in the countryside? Explain and give your own opinion
The world's population is increasing at a fast pace, which is giving rise to concern in many nations that urgently require extra homes to house those new inhabitants. This undeniable fact raises the question of whether the new homes should be built within city limits, or whether new residential zones should be developed on the outskirts. In my opinion, each of this scenarios have advantages and disadvantages, and would affect the economic and society differently.
On one side, local governments would definitely spend much less money on planning, developing and building the new dwelling units. The existing public infrastructure (water supply, roads, public lighting, ect.) would be almost sufficient to cover the new demand, the so governments would invest the pertinent public funds on a small infrastructure expansion. There would not be need to increase taxes to raise money, thus family economy would not be affected negatively. However, the more people live in the same city, the more crowded will be. In other words, the number of city residents would increase exponentially, resulting in public services (hospitals, schools, welfare services) virtually collapsed, which in turn would have a negative effect on the quality of life of the society.
On the other side, new towns on the city peripheries would offer more green areas, more contact with the nature, and more relaxed life, factors that deeply influence in the life of all human being in any society. In addition, the new homes would be more ample, bigger as there would be enough land to planning comfortable units. Unfortunately, living outside of the big cities, or in small towns far from them, has the inconvenients of spending much time on commuting. Most of their residents would still work in the city, where the most of the jobs are. This would provoke that families share less time together as much of it would be waste on roads.
To sum up, the unstoppable population growth is putting pressure on different parts of the world. This brings up the complex issue of building new homes on the actual cities or on the outskirts of them. Whichever would be the alternative selected, it would impact the community at large and the local economy positively and negatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
The worlds population is increasing at a fast pace...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nhabitants. This undeniable fact raises the question of whether the new homes should be built within ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n the outskirts. In my opinion, each of this scenarios have advantages and disadvant...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Would
...er supply, roads, public lighting, ect. would be almost sufficient to cover the new d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e new homes would be more ample, bigger as there would be enough land to planning ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, thus, well, in addition, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09189189189 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73944751379 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0109559904 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27842340172 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090342325352 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781164249407 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183535607694 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705560390734 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.