Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement??
The way in which governments use public funding is a matter of controversy. It is argued by some that major investments should be done in ameliorating public services rather than in arts (music, theater etc.), since there is no a palpable benefit from it. I partially agree with this statement as both areas should have equal approach.
There is no doubt that by having modern, efficient and good public services (hospital, schools, roads, and the like), the quality of life of people would be definitely better. For instance, if educational centers are properly equipped, with top-notch teachers, our kids would receive an excellent education. That is why, public administrations always destined a significant amount of its budget to this area each fiscal year.
On the other hand, recreational activities is an intrinsic part of human being. It is an indispensable area not only for entertainment purposes, but alto it is the main way to trigger creative, particularly in children. Spain, aware of this undeniable fact, during the last 10 years has allocated a quarter of its annual funds to ameliorate theaters, music halls and gallery arts to offer a breadth of artistic activities and event to its citizens.
In conclusion, although it is true that governments should paid special attention to public services as they are a way to measure nation's quality of life, it is also true that arts, in all its expressions, is also a factor of that equation, and as such should be also taken into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vestments should be done in ameliorating public services rather than in arts musi...
^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...rts music, theater etc., since there is no a palpable benefit from it. I partially...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.028 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89889634171 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8971926564 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.7 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180267755517 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644655490932 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478193848853 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104924846933 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661784997347 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.