Nowadays, families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this.
Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society.
Traditionally, families used to be strongly close, but due to different factors such as the overuse of technology and the fact that both parents have to work, that strong bonds are weakening. This social phenomenon can have negative effects on the society as a whole.
As it is pointed out by several studies, technology has become not only an essential tool for humanity progress but also has turned to be a greater distractor. Most people, particularly teenagers, spend hours on end surfing in the Internet during their free or leisure time, putting aside the needed time for their love ones. As a result, families do not share love each other, ending in a bitter or just plain relationship. Another important cause of this social concern, is that both family's head must work to support their children, economically speaking. In Spain, for instance, if there is no two salaries in a household, it would be hard to have a decent life.
The lack of love among families could lead to negative consequences on the society. Those kids, who do not receive the necessary attention, protection and love from their progenitors, would not develop a sense of respect and compassion for others. They would not feel empathy for those in needs, ignoring or remaining aloof when facing unlawful situations such as elderly abuse.
To sum up, the usual togetherness among families has been decimated as a result of the scarce time that is spent in building and enhancing the special links (love, protectiveness, among other) that glue them. People are either distracted with the ever-advancing technology or struggling with the avoidable workload.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-24 | JimmyMcgill | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | Singh-saab | 56 | view |
| 2017-05-06 | sherin rijo | 25 | view |
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?? 61
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 84
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The dangers and complexities of the modern world have made the mobile phone an absolute necessity for children.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or. Most people, particularly teenagers, spend hours on end surfing in the Intern...
^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it would be hard to have a decent life. The lack of love among families could le...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...awful situations such as elderly abuse. To sum up, the usual togetherness among ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82302895051 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6450591503 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187582488812 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644000148254 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528480402175 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106930130279 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702757656765 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.