In many countries, the government prefer to spend more money on the arts. Some people agree that. But some people think that government should spend more on health and education. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In many homelands, the authorities prefer spend a a lot of money on the arts. Some people believed that. However, have many people believed that government should spend more on health and education. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of government like to spend more money on the arts. First, government subsidies for art are believed to equalize talented opportunities among young adolescent regardless of their background. This financial support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall art lover rate of lower-income people but also give art for advertising and famous over the world by famous artists in their country, country could spread their culture and tradition and mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, support for art would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that talent, skill and advertising human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once government spend more money on the arts. First, spend a lot of money on the arts would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from school tuition and fees, government could become over-reliant on the other states budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, support for art than any other parts would tempt many young people including including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in art pursuit, thereby, adding great burdens for education quality and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time and money that these people could have spent pursuing more important paths. It, instead, would be a more financial viable option if the resources were focused on supporting for art lover and have the passion or less privileged yet gifted students.
In conclusion, this argument have many advantages but in my perspective this argument had disadvantages overweight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...homelands, the authorities prefer spend a a lot of money on the arts. Some people b...
^^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...homelands, the authorities prefer spend a a lot of money on the arts. Some people...
^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...homelands, the authorities prefer spend a a lot of money on the arts. Some people b...
^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: including
...her parts would tempt many young people including including those who are not academically inclined...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45810055866 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86876268095 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583798882682 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.6176596271 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.266666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335870396587 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12610087505 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111757760615 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204994469487 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143419293794 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.