The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table chart illustrate the rate of national spending on different items in five different homelands in 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of national consumers in five different countries in 2002 is highest in Turkey of food and drink but in leisure and education is the lowest. However, it can see clear more if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the table chart in 2002. It can be seen that, the percentage of items in Turkey is highest among five countries ( 32,14%), but in Sweden did not (15,77%). Ranked after second Turkey is Ireland ( 28,9%). By contrast, Turkey and Ireland also is the highest rate in clothing and foot wear, only a few percent different (6,63%) and (6,43%). However, in Sweden is lowest among five countries (5,40%). Meanwhile, the percentage of people buying for leisure and education is the lowest consumer. Compared to Ireland and Turkey on both before items, on this items. Sweden is highest and had the significantly increased ( 3,32%). Ireland and Turkey ( 2,21%) and (4,35%).
Look at the chart with the remaining two countries is Italy and Spain. The rate of food and drink is stable and Spain is higher than Italy 2% when Spain ( 18,80%) and Italy ( 16,36%). Thi figure between those two countries are not too above each other. Clothing in Italy ( 9%), Spain (6,51%). Meanwhile, in Spain of leisure had the significantly reduced (1,98%) and Italy (3,20%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, it can be seen that the percentage of national consumers in five different cou...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Turkey is highest among five countries 32,14%, but in Sweden did not 15,77%. Ra...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...%. Ranked after second Turkey is Ireland 28,9%. By contrast, Turkey and Ireland a...
^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and and Turkey on both before items, on this items. Sweden is highest and had the si...
^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hest and had the significantly increased 3,32%. Ireland and Turkey 2,21% and 4,3...
^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly increased 3,32%. Ireland and Turkey 2,21% and 4,35%. Look at the chart with...
^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Spain is higher than Italy 2% when Spain 18,80% and Italy 16,36%. Thi figure bet...
^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an Italy 2% when Spain 18,80% and Italy 16,36%. Thi figure between those two cou...
^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... too above each other. Clothing in Italy 9%, Spain 6,51%. Meanwhile, in Spain of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7949790795 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42057351363 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485355648536 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4387966997 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.4117647059 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0588235294 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134774101409 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456415326722 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685317690888 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11620291277 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862532101075 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 78.4519038076 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.