In many countries, government spends valuable amount of money in improving the internet access?
Why is this happening?
Is it appropriate that government spend money on this?
There are an increasing number of people who are using the internet for a variety of purpose. In some countries, technological advances such as the internet have been funded by the government. I believe that global competition is a valid argument for the government to pour resources into this and it is beneficial to the country as a whole.
To begin with, globalization is a primary reason for the government to allocate funds in strengthening the internet access. As most country’s economy is reliant to a worldwide integration of trade and business, the competition to be connected with different countries using the internet post a greater challenge. Funding this will lead to a better communication between other nations. For instance, in a business forum held in Brisbane Australia, the majority of the members of the international business group agreed that a faster connection on the internet will yield to a better growth in the business and the economy. Thus, it makes it clear that the cost of funding is justified.
Furthermore, the money that the government spent on improving internet connection will be return to the government resources through tax payment. The growth of the economy will bring enormous business in the country, therefore more tax collection will be expected to come from business and employment. This will enable the government to allocate more funds in the health, education, and infrastructure that will benefit all the members of society. For example, Singapore has been voted in ASEAN as the most livable country in Asia because of its development in technology alongside with other government benefits that everyone is receiving. In contrast, if the government is not supporting the internet accessibility, this will not be possible.
In conclusion, although the government has a priority expenditure such as health and education, I believe that it is also worthwhile to invest in the technology that will benefit us all.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266666666667 0.247107183377 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.142028985507 0.155533422707 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0811594202899 0.0946595960268 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0231884057971 0.0501214627716 46% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0231884057971 0.0437548338989 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147826086957 0.122226691241 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0405797101449 0.0403226058552 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.11063393903 2.80594681477 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0347826086957 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.139130434783 0.0861772015684 161% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0260869565217 0.021408717616 122% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00869565217391 0.011925033212 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1976.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25316455696 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392405063291 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341772151899 0.28420135186 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.272151898734 0.203846283523 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174050632911 0.137316102897 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11063393903 2.80594681477 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.037074148 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496835443038 0.56093040696 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.1834690828 60.7387585426 83% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5714285714 20.7743622355 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3105527473 49.517814964 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.142857143 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7743622355 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 56.7486437613 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.41538461538 1.69124875643 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390788933451 0.332605444948 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124036077637 0.102741220458 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0675028422639 0.0668466124924 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.605573565934 0.534860350844 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171006229707 0.148594505496 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185240074001 0.134430193775 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658621332037 0.0742795772207 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.542174728313 0.324371583561 167% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0817525675104 0.0638462369009 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290450461358 0.228012699653 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426109229053 0.058150111329 73% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.