In many countries, more and more men are staying at home to look after their children when women work full-time. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative development?
In the modern world, it is not uncommon to see a man taking the role of stay-at-home father, while his spouse works as a breadwinner for the family. This phenomenon indicates an improvement in gender equality and I believe it is a positive trend.
Apparently, the major cause for this change is that more people have abandoned the traditional beliefs about women’s role in the society. Traditionally, women were limited in their roles. They were once seen as only needed to bear children and take care of household activities such as cooking and cleaning, while their husbands would feed the family. However，there has been a radical change in this case because of the numerous feminist movements in the past decades. Now more and more women are given the equal opportunities to receive education and pursue a successful career, thus some males began to leave the task of feeding the family to their higher paid wives, and undertake the duty of caring for children back at home.
In my view, this trend is definitely a sign of social progress. We all know that both genders have their own merits, however the traditional beliefs related to gender discrimination could deprive a women of the rights and chances to fully use and develop her talents in the workplace. Thanks to the rise in the public awareness of gender equality, a great number of excellent females are encouraged to become productive members in various fields of the world. This is definitely beneficial to the society as a whole.
In conclusion, the redefinition of women’s role in the society results in the shift of the family duties between the two genders, and I strongly believe this is a positive development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... to gender discrimination could deprive a women of the rights and chances to fully use ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...o gender discrimination could deprive a women of the rights and chances to fully use ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e family duties between the two genders, and I strongly believe this is a positiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95438596491 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86523832225 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6736470868 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182479547668 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556440542429 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546263887075 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947087458398 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555248211692 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.