In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?
It is a burgeoning trend in people food choices that, imported food has been escalating than local productions. However, the foremost reason behind the fact that, a negative belief in peoples mind such as imported food would be quality checked and low of cost. The government could tackle this situation by the proper education and apply higher tariff for imported items.
Initially, many importing companies spreads a false information among peoples regarding the quality and quantity would be more in imported foods than local foods. In other words, it is a fact that, many products are fame in the market after the security check up and certification process. Thereby, many people believe that, such products would be better in trait and authentic. For instance, most of the imported products must be verified by certain council and affiliation and pass through legislation and agree the rules and regulations. Moreover, which is often considered that local food preparations were mostly man made and higher efforts than machine prepared and sealed things. Owing to the fact that, little bit changes may reasonable in charges they applied for in compared to packaged and processed items from other areas. People often prefer to bring cheaper items by the effect of inflation and financial crisis.
Nevertheless, local government and food agencies could resolve such trend by constitution, awareness and by levy to some extent. Since, quality check up and regulatory impact must be discriminate equally for alien and indigenous products would lead to reliance for both products among the people. At once, instruct the people about the importance of accept and health benefit of stuffs which is manufactured locally. Get ride of extra tax for national food products and make use of tariff to the things which is coming from other nationalities or countries must be cover by law enforcement. Furthermore, encourage inhabitants to involve food production and avoid excessive dependency of imported stuff which is available in own country. For instance in India, avoid exotic coconut, wheat products and rice.
To sum up, nevertheless, alien products has inevitable stand in national food sector mostly by the poor knowledge of efficiency of local foods, or cost issues. Proper food management in selection and worth usage may mitigate the extreme influence of foreign foods in compared to local cuisines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... sealed things. Owing to the fact that, little bit changes may reasonable in charges they ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e often prefer to bring cheaper items by the effect of inflation and financial cr...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople about the importance of accept and health benefit of stuffs which is manufa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, for instance, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3167539267 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73138531187 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6942696563 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336141233438 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11393927704 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998755658404 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226957659188 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623505224635 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.