Many schools suppose that there is a shortage of science students. While it is necessary to identify the possible causes of this trend, it is also important to predict its effects on society.
First and foremost, it is undoubted that science courses usually too hard to study, which sometimes as a deterrent. In fact, apart from a few students who get a good grasp of science fields, most students get a sense of anxiety as they have to deal with science subjects such as mathematics and chemical and so on. Worse still, some of the students even fall behind their subjects and drop out of their colleges. Another cause could be significant influences of genders on selecting subjects in many countries. For example, while some countries which have to primarily be reliant on tourism sectors tend to allocate more resources on artistic and literate heritages, related majors are more attracted to female students than their male counterparts.
Consequently, this trend results in some disadvantages in our societies. Firstly, a job imbalance probably would be brought about, which negatively effects on societies. While a number of non-science students exert higher pressure on related job markets such as singers and composers, the lack of students who are equipped with science knowledge leads to a decreasing trend of the number of trained professionals to find solutions to urgent issues such as searching for alternative energy sources and fighting against climate change. Secondly, this trend is sometimes not suitable for developments of some countries that need to take industrial sectors into their considerations, so this trend then leads to an increase in unemployment rates in such countries.
In conclusion, the tendency of selecting non-science subjects is quite ubiquitous in some countries for some reasons and this trend brings some drawbacks to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cs and chemical and so on. Worse still, some of the students even fall behind their subject...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28187919463 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9164066389 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.9854484751 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196597429347 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757615000598 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439712346066 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120884263141 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457603138931 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.