In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent?
It tends to become a wide practice for the youngsters to create neologisms in mother tongue forgetting old-fashioned or national manners to speak. Due to this fact traditional languages are on the verge of extinction. It is a controversial issue and this essay will discuss pros and cons of the situation and will give a conclusion.
On the one hand, young people have the number of reasonable grounds to pursue their way in development. First of all, the globalization seems to dictate its rule for the life of coming to the establishing one common language in the world. Secondly, it might be the own desire of the youth to be dissimilar to the elder generation and, finally, they may consideR to economize the time and energy on learning unnecessary subjects on their glance, such as conventional customs and lexical expressions.
By contrast of the statements above, there appears to be strongly VALID rejections on the each point. People could not deny the changeable process in the world of integration and demolishing of the borders between countries and individuals. Nevertheless it is considerable to realize that the strength of every nation is in distinctions. This demonstrates that diversity is making our being rich and meaningful. Moreover, in the attempt of the youngers to be different they should remember the heritage of their folk as it makes them proud for the nation and shows their place in the history. If the descents may have HAD applied to the past In the minutes of the desperation, they would have felt the encouraging of the ancestors. Furthermore, there is nothing judgmental in the profit-oriented methods (OF WHAT?) among the youngsters, despite this they do not have to address the cultural values, as it is a duty of the citizens to save the legacy. So they should select another approach of economizing their force unlikeLY related to the traditions.
Admittedly, the society does not SEE something destructive in the simplicity of the linguistic constructions, however, it may well lead to the lessenING of the person’s well-being according to the feature that they start to lose their nature. It is logical to conclude that the absence of ONE’s proper education in traditional vocabulary and grammar will have detrimental impact, thus, the government and the community together ought to pay particular attention on this disputable problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation and will give a conclusion. On the one hand, young people have the n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal customs and lexical expressions. By contrast of the statements above, the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ders between countries and individuals. Nevertheless it is considerable to realize that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 814, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Among
...in the profit-oriented methods OF WHAT? among the youngsters, despite this they do no...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e unlikeLY related to the traditions. Admittedly, the society does not SEE som...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17223650386 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11015740495 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575835475578 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2286052652 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.352941176 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107552634923 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324162678897 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032225901948 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625212894222 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169994169281 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.