: in many countries, people can eat a wide variety of food today. As a result, they eat food from other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh disadvantages.
In the era of globalization, foreign food has dominated the natural cuisine. While this fact is associated with several shortcomings, I am of the opinion that the benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, the negative side of this issue is ascribed to a number of factors. First of all, some people argue that the domination of foreign food has deterred the value of traditional food. This is because the oversea food is considered as more appealing and attractive to customers due to its unfamiliar flavor. As a result, local people are likely to priority this type of food rather than local cuisine. Secondly, some strange food might pose a threat to human health. To be more specific, local people might fall victim to allergies symptom when eating unknown dishes which included unfamiliar ingredients.
On the other hand, I advocate that it is more beneficial to try wide variety of cuisine. A primary reason for that is this experience might broaden the horizon of customer. This is because people might learn from other countries’s flavor, ingredients and cooking recipes. In the era of globalization, this insight of cultures is critical for people to tighten their social cohesion and reap the fruition in the future. Moreover, eating food from other countries has created a chance for immigrants to earn a living. In fact, there are many foreign restaurants belonged to immigrants which are serving both inhabitants and tourists. This lead to enhance the living standards of either locals or foreigners who chose to stay in other regions
In conclusion, there are several factors contributing to the drawbacks of foreign food’s domination, I am firmly convinced that the its merits far outweigh its demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
... domination, I am firmly convinced that the its merits far outweigh its demerits.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16961130742 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89138796457 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5168838662 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277051581669 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914294070355 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075103603432 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146441894581 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760773447645 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.