In many countries, people like to eat a wider range of food that cannot be grown in their local place. Therefore, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages?
These days, it is quite common for people to eat foods that are not, or cannot, be cultivated or produced where they live. As a consequence, more and more residents become fans of overseas cuisine. In my perspective, I think that this trend has both pros and cons effects and this essay will outline them below.
Thanks to globalization, it is easier than ever to move goods including food from one country to another, people now can easily taste a diverse array of foods like never before. This tendency has many advantages. Firstly, having access to a wide variety of foods from different regions can provide people with a highly nutritious diet that can help to promote health and prevent disease. For example, some kinds of nutrient-rich berries that can only be grown in Asia can now be enjoyed by people all over the world. Furthermore, those who are interested in food culture in another country can experience it without leaving their own country.
On the other hand, like two sides of a coin, there are also catastrophic influences that should be considered. The high and prolonged consumption of international foods will force governments have to import more and that push them into a situation called the trade deficit. The trade deficit causes many disastrous issues on the economy such as depleting foreign currency reserves and inflation. In addition, another trouble with this phenomenon is that the constant transportation of foods over long distances contributes to climate change due to the large amount of carbon emissions produced by transportation. And lastly, there are many foods that are transported from one area to another need to be treated with chemicals and preservatives which make them less healthy to consume.
In conclusion, although food diversification can bring many benefits, personally, I believe that the disadvantages of this trend are still outweighed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, so, still, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16504854369 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89434756541 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624595469256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4240351382 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292090004551 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889448686517 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051018188866 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157570726498 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405415851663 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.