In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree?
ollowing the onset of industrialisation and the sustained urban growth of large population centres in England, the buildup of waste in the cities caused a rapid deterioration in levels of sanitation" title="sanitation" style="color: rgb(11, 0, 128); background-image: none;">sanitation and the general quality of urban life. The streets became choked with filth due to the lack of waste clearance regulations.[9] Calls for the establishment of a municipal authority with waste removal powers occurred as early as 1751, when Corbyn Morris in london proposed that "... as the preservation of the health of the people is of great importance, it is proposed that the cleaning of this city, should be put under one uniform public management, and all the filth be...conveyed by the Thames to proper distance in the country".[10]
However, it was not until the mid-19th century, spurred by increasingly devastating cholera outbreaks and the emergence of a public health debate that the first legislation on the issue emerged. Highly influential in this new focus was the report The Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Populationin 1842[11] of the social reformer, Edwin Chadwick, in which he argued for the importance of adequate waste removal and management facilities to improve the health and wellbeing of the city's population.
In the UK, the Nuisance removal and Disease Prevention act of 1846 began what was to be a steadily evolving process of the provision of regulated waste management in london. The Metropolitan Board of Works was the first citywide authority that centralized sanitation regulation for the rapidly expanding city and the public health act 1875" style="color: rgb(11, 0, 128); background-image: none;">public health act 1875 made it compulsory for every household to deposit their weekly waste in "moveable receptacles" for disposal—the first concept for a dust-bin.[12]
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ollowing
ollowing the onset of industrialisation and the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75172413793 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.0163163061 2.80592935109 143% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 20.2975951904 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.291229478 49.4020404114 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 278.0 106.682146367 261% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.3333333333 20.7667163134 233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0270696687905 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0172215890122 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020467017494 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0170790047788 0.151304729494 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135181395059 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.8 13.0946893788 228% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 14.3 50.2224549098 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.2 11.3001002004 205% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.96 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.1190380762 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.