In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while other believer this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One of thd most controversial issue relates to that in a developing country; more proportion of older people gives benefits or not? Through this essay, I will explore some dimensions of the given topic through some examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
To start with, there are some people who believe that their should be older people in a country. They strengthen their viewpoint by saying that, older people have more experience in every field. Similarly, experience is very beneficial for every field as well. They also think that, older people had been through many difficult situations, they are aware of various ups and downs, and know how to tackle them. They give an illustration of multinational companies which reveals their preference of employees they need, which is experienced people.
Probing ahead, there is no doubt that older people have benefits but, also contain problems for the country. Additionally, another group of people feels that, older people are burden on economy. The main reason for believing that is the facilities which government has to provide them such as, health care facilties, pension, and subsidies which makes them a burden. Moreover, they also say that, government should contribute their money into poverty, education facilities and on other major issues rather than on facilities of older people. They think that, aged people can not do labour work more efficiently as compared to young people. However, another reason for believing that, older people require extra care and
attention which leads to ignorance of relatives due to generation gap and poverty which makes them feel horrible.
Eventually, there are number of answers to this question but, on balance I tend to believe that, if older people should be in a considerable portion that can be helpful rather than in extreme proportion because, its awful for economy and for themselves as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lities of older people. They think that, aged people can not do labour work more ...
^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat, older people require extra care and attention which leads to ignorance of re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, as to, no doubt, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60867509151 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9788220456 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254960110313 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937699820931 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529418925151 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134048766623 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695446344393 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.