In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that there should be a limitation for high earners while others believe that earning as much as possible could help the society develop overall. From my perspective, I agree with the second viewpoint.
On the one hand, many people think that having a maximum wage could narrow the gap between entrepreneurs. It is evident that if businesses have a similar amount of salary, they could have equal treatment, meaning there is no distinction between the wealthy and poor ones. Therefore, companies could cut down plenty of money which is paid for superior and thus have more to invest in other beneficial areas to promote the whole company. Not only that, but all the staff could also have a good relationship as they do not feel jealous with their partner about the salary. Definitely, all their effort can be made on work instead of scrutinizing the others.
On the other hand, despite the argument mentioned above, our society can strongly improve if the people have the freedom to earn as much as they want. An increase in salary may be what employees need to motivate them to work better. It is undeniable that the more they attempt to the higher income they get will inspire them to pay more attention and work more productive. This could result in a huge contribution to the economic foundation of the country. Furthermore, deleting the limitation of high earners will create many opportunities for them to do charity that supports the others. Controlling people’s wages will certainly make them just enough to satisfy daily demands while obeying them comfortably earning could let them have more money to help the outside community.
In conclusion, although there are many benefits of the maximum salary, I believe that no limitations of the high earner will allow them to enhance their life and society overall.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94822006472 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61693261629 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1220078037 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133159808137 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469325197517 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403169072003 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863838577131 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207398025862 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.