In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In a lot of nations, a small percentage of people earn sky-high salaries. A set of people believe that this is beneficial for the country, but others think that legal bodies should not allow earnings above a certain level. In the following essay, I will consider both sides of this issue and finally
give my opinion.
Those in favor of keeping a high salary, argue that high earning generates employment. For instance, a luxury hotel or restaurant can not function without its staff. hence it proves that certain industries like hospitality can not survive without generating employment. Further, the prospect of high pay pushes people to work harder to achieve their goals. High paying job plays like an incentive for them and that is the fuel that makes them work double.
However, the opposing view is not without its merits. Much current research indicates that societies in which wealth is fairly equally divided have better health and education in addition to a greater sense of well-being. For example, it has been demonstrated that a lot of cardiovascular accidents in the United States could have been prevented with better distribution of economic resources. With a huge amount of funds comes great responsibility. If the finances are not handled properly, it can lead to great concern for society. For this reason, the government should regulate the limit on wages.
In conclusion, both sides seem to have some sound arguments. However, I feel that government should be limit the high income as it would result in less hiring and a lower work ethic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ant can not function without its staff. hence it proves that certain industries like ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...ant can not function without its staff. hence it proves that certain industries like ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'limited'?
Suggestion: limited
...wever, I feel that government should be limit the high income as it would result in l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02307692308 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68613578283 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1714666554 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253624994124 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742449454616 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836665662192 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150034974478 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111324963502 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.