In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the recent days, there is a general consensus that giving high salaries for some of the staff has beneficial effects for the companies while other argue that it is essential for the authorities to restrict the range of income in a particular level. In this essay, I am going to discuss both point of views and explain why I am prone to the former opinion.
There are many merits of paying higher money for some employees. The first culprit is that they have the right to receive the income which compatible for their qualification and effort. It acts as an incentive to encourage individuals to contribute more for the success of the companies. For example, the level of salaries of a professor can not equal with those who only have college degree. The second one that high salary is one of the pivotal factors which increase the ability of staff. Since this can be considered as a target, staff will endeavor to move up a ladder in working.
On the other hand, some individuals argue that the limitation of salary is important. People often have this notion because it decreases the envy among workers. There are those who always have prejudice with the person who has higher income, as in their slants, it is unfair. Moreover, instead of spend too much money on a small number of people, the company can use it for the other useful purposes like upgrading the infrastructure and security system of the company or allocating for the governments to improve living standard of resident.
In conclusion, I believe that both opinions have their merits, however, I agree with the view that it is beneficial to giving high salaries for some people because it not only suitable with their ability but also encourage staff to work more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
In the recent days, there is a general consensus that giving high salaries for some of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...consensus that giving high salaries for some of the staff has beneficial effects for the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ver, instead of spend too much money on a small number of people, the company can use it for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... with the view that it is beneficial to giving high salaries for some people because i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77227722772 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58354506333 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528052805281 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.475464998 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258734275965 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840943242216 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549100805637 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16436744651 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305972119838 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.