In the number of dense population, the preference for living accommodation is the biggest challenge for people who lived in the city. There are several pro and contra in the term about whether inhabitant must stay in their extended family or find their own new house to live as personal with their nuclear family. This essay will give the best option and differentiate between negative and positive value.
To begin with, living with a small family is more efficient. This argument supported by the data that living allowance in the city has high expenditure. Furthermore, if people live together with their extended family, they will take a risk because they must pay more money. Equally important, the city offers the best option for buying a new home by credit so that, indirectly, people decide not only to have a new house but also to invest money in-retailer.
On the other hand, there are several negative impacts if people stay outside the extended family. Firstly, people must prepare a lot of money and have a good job to choose a life as personal in their own home. many inhabitants who declare to buy a new home will take a risk to pay for long term credit for 15 years or 20 years. Secondly, living with extended family increase socialization among personal but, if people prefer to live with the nuclear family, there is no way for people to increase their bonding intimacy with others. Thirdly, the higher number of a nuclear family who stays in the city, the higher the demand for free land to substitute as houses.
In conclusion, living to be a nuclear family is good because people decide to live by themselves which people don’t obtain with extended family but this option has a risk. So, people must take their decision at the appropriate time carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pro seems to be countable; consider using: 'several pros'.
Suggestion: several pros
...people who lived in the city. There are several pro and contra in the term about whether in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'contras'?
Suggestion: contras
... in the city. There are several pro and contra in the term about whether inhabitant mu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... risk because they must pay more money. Equally important, the city offers the best opt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...e a life as personal in their own home. many inhabitants who declare to buy a new ho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81168831169 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50978016131 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1806835121 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23653455714 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937328302335 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595528200351 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174844945431 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290095524152 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.