The invention of technology in agriculture shall be followed by the well-being of farmer and inhabitant, because of technologies built to making utilization for the human race. But, in actual condition, there are some countries which can not support their main food by themselves. This essay will give some explanation about this problem and inform good ways to solve it.
To begin with, the most reason is that the improvement of technology is not faster than the growth of population in the world. The deficit of the main food emerges because the number of production in agriculture cannot be managed to full-fill demand in the market so that the price of goods goes high. Furthermore, the salary of inhabitant remains stable than the price of the main food is not achievable. For example, the number of the population who lived in is not controlled. There is no regulation to control the bomber population but the number of main foods is just a little although there are some technologies to support the production of agriculture.
To solve this problem, the revelation of technology shall be supported by the role of the government. There are some explanations to minimize the deficiency of food. Firstly, the information about new technology must be informed to the farmer about how to manage and increase production when the stock is limitless. The number of food which will be the main supply of the masses must be adjusted to be greater than demand. Secondly, to make the farmer more productive, the management of stock exchange (export-import) shall be regulated to making advantage for the farmer. For example, in the harvest season, the import shall be stopped. Thirdly, the price of the product shall be controlled in the range of stability. By this way, it will make the price of the main food to be stable and achievable.
In conclusion, the advancement of technology will start to minimize the number of poverty if the government who has the regulation can drive the process such as production, distribution, price, and sharing knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stable and achievable. In conclusion, the advancement of technology will start...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00874635569 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91110463059 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463556851312 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9928867888 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.058823529 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161866299571 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597563873902 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375108299383 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10316932747 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661165829083 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.