In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

These days We know that the information about criminalism can widespread rapidly, since the television share about criminal activities. In my opinion, I believe that the advantages to inform this will be higher than the drawbacks.
It is true that criminal activities are negative information. As bad news, if the information open to the public, the criminal trials are not only learned by the good people as a prevention but also informed to the criminal communities to be a recommendation for their trials. In addition, if the information about these activities is a success, they will have much confidence to apply their action by using these methods. For example, in recent days, in Indonesia, many criminals utilize a smartphone to deny the victims and push them to give personal accounts. Then, this method is published on TV so that other criminals adopt this way.
On the other hand, there are many benefits according to this situation. Firstly, The public will know about the kinds of popular criminalism in their area due to sharing on the headline news on Television. Furthermore, this information will be provided by actual data so that it can motivate the public to increase self-awareness. For instance, if the criminal communities use the smartphone to collect privacy accounts such as PIN, Password, and others, the public will think again to share those data with the stranger people.
In addition, sharing criminal trials with the television will persuade the public to be aware of criminal activities in their area. For instance, after the information that is taken from television, people will be more careful to answer the call from strangers, share personal information, and protect their area with security technology such as smart door, CCTV, and others.
In conclusion, although sharing information will be a risk, this information gives many advantages to the public to increase self-awareness about criminal activities.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25320512821 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96066247173 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8186102414 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187513892259 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778773584345 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593103205934 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122165001625 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166828909771 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.