In recent years, the demand for cars has been changed from expensive goods to the primary goods. This information is obviously right because most of the compliance which was created by the government directly to give the opportunity to the consumer / civil to have an easy access to buy some cars. Furthermore, these statement convenience to the argument that the traffic jam increases significantly as the same as the number of cars that are used.
To begin with, Development of technology make humans become moveable quickly from one place to the others. Firstly, Cars become a new solution for people to be the favorable transportation because of their easy access and they are cheaper than some others type of public transportation. If many people have the equal thinking about these statements, we don’t astonishment that many cars bring to the increase of traffic jam, especially, in the working hour. Secondly, there is no government regulation to managing the quantity of car ownership, for example, every family must own just one car and the taxes shall be expensive because these goods are categorized become glamour thing.
The number of cars in the world shall be stabilized by the government role. The readiness of public transportation shall be emerged to decrease the utilization of personal car. They use their car because they don’t feel comfortable with the preference for public transportation. If the government built the new technology for public transportation such as monorail train, and make the hard access to buy a car. It will be effective to change the masses main-set to use their own car. This why the preparation of public transportation relates to the use of personal cars.
To sum up, the development of car ownership should be managed by the government role. Moreover, the government shall prepare the substitution of public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...rtunity to the consumer / civil to have an easy access to buy some cars. Furthermore, these st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this statement' or 'these statements'?
Suggestion: this statement; these statements
...y access to buy some cars. Furthermore, these statement convenience to the argument that the tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2131147541 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05456102091 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514754098361 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.785446413 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167738410656 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617714270039 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477378118983 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107841055232 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160381552274 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.