In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television for the public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Criminal activities are in raising in almost all over the world. It is always in debate that broadcasting criminal trials to the general public is appropriate. This essay will discuss with facts, why the positive effects are not outweighing the negative effects.
Some people can say it have more advantages, most of the developing countries highlight this because they believe that it will help the people to understand the weight of the process and the criminals. Moreover, the governments expect that this will help to raise an awareness and hopefully reduce the crime rate. For an example, if the public can see a criminal trial of a murder, it will be very informative to the public to understand the strength of the justice system.
But there are more negative effects than the positive effects specially for the family of the offender. For an example, if a person convicted for a robbery and the trial was broadcast over the media, people try to corner not only the convict, but also the family members and relatives. This will be very bad for them because it will let them down emotionally. Although the felon released from jail after the completion of the given sentences, he cannot face the public or get a job even he was rehabilitated. Furthermore, some developed countries censor the face of the convict to protect his privacy. So that, the family members of that convict can still interact with the people around them.
In conclusion, even though some government thinks that showing criminal trials over the media is helping them to reduce the crime rate, developed countries who respect the persons privacy will not allow mainly because not only it will affect the convicted person emotionally, but also to the family members.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hat broadcasting criminal trials to the general public is appropriate. This essay will discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...gative effects. Some people can say it have more advantages, most of the developing...
^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...of that convict can still interact with the people around them. In conclusion, even though some gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l interact with the people around them. In conclusion, even though some governme...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...te, developed countries who respect the persons privacy will not allow mainly because n...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onally, but also to the family members.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96928327645 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63072416229 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508532423208 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3167089741 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198033316321 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740697565648 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590928683114 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130731757809 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02077515332 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.