Nowadays, television is growing rapidly to share the big amount of information in just a minute. However, the most debatable issue among the public is that criminal trials should be published or not. Although sharing about recent criminal trials is important, I believe that minimizing this will take more benefits.
To begin with, it is good to share about recent criminals as a way to update the information to the public. Furthermore, television will explain in detail how this action is a success so that they will learn and try to prevent to be the next victim in the future. For instance, the modus of crime in the bank, which is the executors try to manipulate and scanning some data in an ID card from its target by asking them about personal information. Then, if this action has been published on the television, It will be learned by the customer to always protect their private data.
However, there are some disadvantages to sharing criminal trials on television. First of all, the successful action will be not only copied by the criminal communities but also learned to improve those actions in order to find the weakness of polices. Then, other similar actions would have happened with some improvement because they have been known about the way of how police tackle the last crime. Secondly, due to the fact that the information of the victims will be shown on television such as name, location, and the chronological of the incident, this activity give some negative impacts on those victims. They could feel that their problem and data will be known by their social circle, then, they would get depression and mental illness because their incident is known by the environment.
In conclusion, although sharing criminal trials take the benefit as prevention, the drawbacks will be higher especially for the victims and it will initiate other criminal trials in the same way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96238244514 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6369655529 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8365192172 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193727520449 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834618096434 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756394440505 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133599614354 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290441522521 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.