The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar charts describe the proportion of weight measurements of people in 5 different age groups in Charlestown between 1955 and 2015.

It is noticeable that the percentage of ideal weight was high in 1955, while many people have a risk of obesity in 2015 especially for people in the age group range of 50 to 69.

In 1955, there are no people who get obesity in the range group of 20-39 and many people have an ideal body of more than a half. In contrast, in 2015, there are few people who start to suffer from obesity just under 10 percent in the range of 20-39. In the age group of 40-49, the proportion of obesity was a slight increase just under 10 % in 1955, but in 2015 this number rise-up significantly at more than 20 %.

On the other hand, while the number of overweight and obesity was below 20 % in 1955, the percentage of people who gain overweight and obesity in 2015 was a dramatic growth of more than a half in the age group of 50-59. Furthermore, both overweight and obese were not controlled by the measurement of weight in 2015 which this number was dominated by those criteria at more than 80 %.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...under 10 percent in the range of 20-39. In the age group of 40-49, the proportion ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44660194175 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48471061657 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480582524272 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.6833826271 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15897063941 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10217440089 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689658822147 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139559820932 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720499451794 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.