In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effect on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion
It is undisputed that technology has turned whole world into a global village where boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance. Presently, the displacement of traditional food with the international fast foods is supposed to be brutal for health, families and the community. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement firmly and some logical points will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are manifold points to shore up my point of view. First and the foremost, health problems are being at the top of the table due to tremendous consumption of junk foods. To demonstrate, nowadays, people are being more workaholic means they do not have enough time to cook homemade foods. Therefore, they have tendency to buy or cook continental foods like chowmein, noodles, pasta et.cetera. Besides this, the widespread availability of fast food restaurants and the food decoration also mesmerize people to have more western food. Consequently, the health concerns such as obesity, skin problem, low immunity are on the elevation. For instance, a recent study found that maximum number of people are diagnosed with cancer due to extreme consumption of junk food.
Further, emphasizing in my point of view, Traditional food symbolize the culture and occasion of a nation. Unfortunately, modern youngsters are more fascinated to learn the recipe of different international food than traditional food. This means the value of traditional cuisine will be vanished in coming future. What is more, gone are the days when family members used to have meal together. Whereas, at present, adults prefer to go restaurants to enjoy continental cuisine. As a result, It affects in the bonding of family members.
To recapitulate, undeniably, people want to eat different foods due to the variation in tastes. But, It is clear that consumption of junk food should reduced because of its great impacts on health, relationship between families members and the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-12 | binita karki | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 71
- Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for the most sports achievements. Others, however, think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- We should pay attention to the opinions of famous people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time. In there opinion children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences. 67
- The gap between rich and poor is growing. What problems does this create? What can be done to tackle them.It is undeniable that a remarkable difference is enormously increasing between the lifestyles of rich and poor class of people.It has created a lot o 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween families members and the society.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30379746835 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95625858635 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4844591833 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204877491592 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618349802735 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754051046049 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127097184271 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178487777737 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.