Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
Many underdeveloped countries are currently expandind their tourism sectors. There is a host of reasons for this phenomenon and personally, I think this has a negative impact on the environment of the country.
The expansion of tourism sectors can be ascribed to economy's benefits, boost relationships and exchange culture between different countries. Regarding to the former, tourists visting one developing country have a high demand for goods and services, and are mostly willing to pay higher than average prices. Hence, this can boost a country's economy and eventually enhance the living standard of people. On the second point, people in developing countries do not have much chance to to acquire new knowledge about other countries's culture due to their limit in Internet , especially in rural areas. Therefore, by promoting tourism industries, travellers from different cultures can provide ethnic people, for instance, who are almost completely isolated from the outside world, can broaden their horizon about new things on the outside world. In turn, ethnic people can introduce their traditionals beliefs and cultures for travellers such as their festivals, traditional food,etc.
However, I opine that this phenomenon can leave a severe in impact on the environment of one country. First of all, the hordes of tourists from foreign countries often litter wherever they go and do not bother to clean after themselves in areas they have visited. As a result, this can lead to dirty roads and clogged sewage system in these places, which negatively and directly affects indigenous people's living conditions. In terms of indirect effects, the indigenous people have to sacrifice their resources to accommodate tourists's insatiable demands. In several mountainoua areas of Vietnam, local people cut down a vast area of forest to make handicrafts or furniture for tourisrs. As a consequence, this has led to environmental degradation in remote areas.
In conclusion, the expansion of tourism sectors in underdeveloped countries is attributable to several reasons in terms of boosting economy and exchanging culture among countries, however, this phenomenon has had some adverse impacts on the environment of those countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...oping countries do not have much chance to to acquire new knowledge about other count...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s culture due to their limit in Internet , especially in rural areas. Therefore, b...
^^
Line 3, column 975, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...uch as their festivals, traditional food,etc. However, I opine that this phenomen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54678362573 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97302912164 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9393074565 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.466666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189266544521 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670742888579 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572470155192 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119679869482 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580340051451 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.