Many employees may work at home with modern technology. Some people claim that it benefits only worker, but not employers. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, working at home is not a new phenomenon as a result of the technology advancements. By utilizing the Internet, telephone, or social messaging apps, people now have a range of possibilities to work remotely. Although some argue that only the employee can reap the benefits from this trend, I believe that this is a win-win situation for both workers and employers.
On the one hand, employees can gain various advantages from home-working. First, since the proliferation of technology makes social networks and messaging apps flourish, workers can work at home, communicate with each other and their bosses without making any physical travels, which enables them to save a bunch of time and cut down expenditure spent on commuting. Second, home working offers employee a more flexible schedule, allowing them to work at their own pace in the absence of their bosses. For example, this trend especially suits jobs that require creativity such as designing, programming or writing as they prone to fail to create high quality products under strict supervision.
On the other hand, employers also derive a myriad of benefits by allowing their worker to work away from the office. One of the most manifest merits is this form of work leads to a lower outlay and demand for office space as they do not have to provide desks and chairs for those who are working from home. Consequently, those resources could be allocated to more necessary purposes such as health insurance for staffs or facility maintenance. Moreover, entrepreneur can harness the social network and applications such as Messenger, Gmail or Skype to supervise, communicate, keep in touch with home workers and even hold teleconferences in lieu of traditional meetings.
In conclusion, for the reasons provided above, I strongly believe that not only is home working conductive to employees, but also to employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'offers'' or 'offer's'?
Suggestion: offers'; offer's
...pent on commuting. Second, home working offers employee a more flexible schedule, allo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22950819672 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90907447895 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0882350873 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247894389823 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895100083725 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486433558659 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158360185095 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375726114283 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.